| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Alex Redwidth
   |
Posted - 2008.07.15 21:44:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Proton Power
When I closed my IPO I had zero intention of Joining Ebank, I didnt even have an account at the time, nor was I invited to do so. I think I joined Ebank what? 4 weeks ago right before i went to sea for 3 weeks if not mistaking.
Later adding...
Originally by: Proton Power
I did ask EBANK not to mention me working for EBANK until I cleared out my IPO.
That's some awesome professional ethics displayed by yourself and EBANK. I think anyone who had ISK tied to either has a right to be rather **ssed with both sides right now.
One also wonders why, if your role is so passive, you weren't either hired as a consultant or your idea wasn't just bought outright by EBANK with you given a share.
I supposed then we'd miss out on all the lol-worthy drama.
|
Alex Redwidth
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 22:08:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Proton Power
Funny how you leave out the reasons why.
To mangle the Misters Python, 'the reasons why don't enter into it'.
I'm just awed that neither you nor EBANK's board seem to have an issue with you turning your back on your shareholders and wrapping up your IPO (apparently not even meeting your own promises), then taking a visible and associated role with EBANK and being trusted with a large degree of influence in a 175B project.
Like I said, your previous IPO shareholders and EBANK investors have every right to be very upset and angry with both you and EBANK.
|
Alex Redwidth
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 22:49:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kwint Sommer
You're really being a drama queen about this.
You're making this out to be a lot worse than it is.
One of his businesses didn't pan out
He didn't meet the promised interest rate
he failed to live up to the return rate
he lost a fair bit of ISK
...his failings as a CEO
He's essentially consulting for them
I don't think that's a big deal.
Now take that failed investment, double it and then some, then have him lining up the consultancy job while his finishing up the shafting of his original shareholders.
How's that not grossly negligent to the original shareholders and an a dangerous example of the lack of ethics of the individual involved?
So how long until Goons can apply to work at EBANK?
|
Alex Redwidth
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 23:23:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nido Gentz
acknowledge the facts of the situation
But I am as no-one's said what I'm saying is a lie. The only defence that keeps being offered is : 'b.b..b.but it wasn't his fault *sniff sniff*'.
Apparently, this makes it all alright. My point is that regardless of intention :
The IPO was wound up rather than whatever obstacles being tackled and removed.
There was not enough personal ISK to cover the promised return.
I haven't suggested the IPO failed intentionally, nor do I, but what I do suggest is that EBANK were well aware of Proton's IPO and the course of action that was being taken.
Even in the BEST light that's massive misjudgement, at worst it is negligence and lack of concern to shareholders by both parties.
If I'm missing something here, then feel free to elaborate on how those aren't worrying traits in a consultants on investment projects of twice the size and how this was merely a crazy awesome move of risk reduction on EBANK's part.
|
Alex Redwidth
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 14:15:00 -
[5]
Originally by: SencneS
Assigning a fund manager such as Proton to utilize a 30% is not unreasonable.
So having been told PP isn't really working for ebank, that at best he's chipping in ideas and consulting, we now are told he's a fund manager with a board approved limit of 200bil?
Bonus points for hilarious use of irony in stating how important complete transparency is.
|
Alex Redwidth
Caldari
Industrial and Merchantile Investment Fund
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 19:57:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Amarr Citizen 155
You've been here for a few hours and all of a sudden you are an expert on the goings on?
Worried they are going to make you redundant?
|
| |
|